not logged in
reply
(rant) Nooooo they be takin my carrot cake @ 2008/06/20 10:38
Goddamnit, I wish I had more carrot cake. One square of the stuff is never enough. It is so good you guys. I can’t wait for Monday, when I will certainly have some more.
Arbor means tree
reply
Re: (rant) Nooooo they be takin my carrot cake @ 2008/06/20 10:42
Carrots a popular theme for this topic.
a lit cigarette is carried at the height of a child's face.
reply
Re: (rant) Nooooo they be takin my carrot cake @ 2008/06/20 10:44
I bet I could model this, some kind of trait persistence

like

the random existence of one-topic is self-reinforcing to a point, and so you end up with extremely random thread clusters
A cromulent graph embiggens the smallest idea.
reply
Re: (rant) Nooooo they be takin my carrot cake @ 2008/06/20 10:49
I bet I could also model this, but in a much better way:

Art = Mentally diseased

Andy = Carrots

Antibox = Message board

Art + Andy + Antibox = Mentally diseased carrot cake message board posts

Post updated by Adam on 2008/06/20 10:49
Awake and Unafraid.
reply
Re: (rant) Nooooo they be takin my carrot cake @ 2008/06/20 11:00
okay so here’s what you do

make a row matrix with.. say, 50,000 cells. Each cell will represent a potential topic. For this simple model all topics will be equally likely but you could tweak this.

then

imagine a world that proceeds with discrete periods. that is, t=0,1,2,3,...

the value in each cell in a given period is denoted V(cell, t), where cell is a whole number in the set [1, 50000]. I claim that V(cell, 0)=0 for every cell; that is, each cell starts out with the same zero value.

For t > 0, we let V(cell, t) = p(V(cell, t-1) + (1-p)ɛ where ɛ is a stochastic variable from a distribution I’ve yet to decide; it is determined in every time period. p is a constant value in the area [0, 1] that could differ for each cell – this would be interesting, as in this case p would be the inertia of a topic. That is a higher p would result in a topic more difficult to start but more enduring once it became prominent.

As I think more about it this is not quit desireable – we should not necessarily link the stochastic factor with the lag factor so explicitly.

Hmm. This is a start but it’s not quite swinging enough. I’m going to think about how to cause burstiness in these threads but I think it should be pretty straightforward.

Back to work!

Post updated by sam on 2008/06/20 11:11
A cromulent graph embiggens the smallest idea.
reply
Re: (rant) Nooooo they be takin my carrot cake @ 2008/06/20 11:11
I like mine better.
Awake and Unafraid.